A Mammogram is a low dose X-ray procedure that is used for the screening of healthy women and for the diagnosis of breast disorders, which include breast cancer and benign conditions.
Currently, the average tumor size felt through this technology for women who’ve had consistent mammograms is about 0.43 inches. The best machines are able to detect growths that are even smaller. Again, one of the key benefits of mammography is detecting tumors that are too small to feel by touch (palpate).
Some centers use digital mammography, a new technology in which X-ray film is replaced by detectors that convert X rays into electronic signals. The detectors are comparable to those found in digital cameras. Physicians say the digital images can be seen on a computer screen or examined like an ordinary mammogram when the image is printed on a special film. The benefit of this technology is that it produces sharper images of breast abnormalities.
A very few centers have these machines, and the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees Health Check devices, offers no listing of Health Check facilities that have them. The FDA suggests women interested in digital mammography to contact the manufacturers to find which Health Check centers in their area may offer this germinating technique. Shapers of digital mammography equipment include G.E. Medical Systems, Fischer Imaging, and Lorad/Hologic.
Even though established mammography is widely cited for its role in detecting tumors, it remains an imperfect tool. The accuracy of a mammogram depends on the age and type of equipment, the skill of the technician operating the machine, the skill and experience of the radiologist reading the film, and the density of the breast tissue being imaged. Experts from the American cancer Society have strong recommendations about the use of mammography. They say, “It is important for women to have their mammograms at a facility where breast imaging is regarded as a specialty, an area of concentration, and where interpretation of mammograms is a significant proportion of the imaging they do.”
If you are not being treated at a major Health Check center you may want to ask if the mammography instruments is up-to-date and accredited by the American College of Radiology and the FDA.
Lourdes R., fifty-four, had been conditioning regular mammograms since age forty. In retrospect she believes the mammography program that offered services free of charge gave her a false sense of assurance. She was stunned when she determined a growth in her left breast on her own that later proved to be a tumour. When Physicians at the teaching hospital where she was diagnosed examined her previous mammograms, they watched their quality to be very poor. Lourdes does not speak English; here, her daughter Magdalena interpreted and commented about the trouble
Greta L. recalls ignoring a gut-level feeling that a mammogram was not being in good order did.